“There is too much animal courage in society and not sufficient moral courage. Christians must take up arms against error at home and abroad. They must grapple with sin in themselves and in others, and continue this warfare until they have finished their course. If they keep the faith, they will have the crown of rejoicing.” (SH 28.)
Concerning moral courage, Samuel Smiles wrote:
“Character is human nature in its best form. It is moral order embodied in the individual. Men of character are not only the conscience of society, but in every well-governed State they are its best motive power; for it is moral qualities in the main which rule the world. Even in war, Napoleon
said the moral is to the physical as ten to one. The strength, the industry, and the civilisation of nations -— all depend upon individual character; and the very foundations of civil security rest upon it. Laws and institutions are but its outgrowth . . . .
“The man of character] must also be a temperate man, and exercise the virtue of self-denial, than which nothing is so much calculated to give strength to the character. John Sterling says truly, that ‘the worst education which teaches self denial, is better than the best which teaches everything else, and not that.’ The Romans rightly employed the same word (virtue) to designate courage, which is in a physical sense what the other is in a moral; the highest virtue of all being victory over ourselves.” (Emphases added.)
Lastly:
“Intrepid, self-oblivious Protestants in a higher sense than ever before, let us meet and defeat the claims of sense and sin, regardless of the bans or clans pouring in their fire upon us; and white-winged charity, brooding over all, shall cover with her feathers the veriest sinner.”
(MW 172:6.)